1 Year Experience
Experienced with Agile methodologies including Scrum, Lean Start-Up principles, MVP development, Jobs-to-be-Done framework, market segmentation, and strategic positioning.
6 Years Experience
Python • R • Altair • gg plot2 • Regression Analysis • Longitudinal Studies • Causal Inference • A/B Testing • CFA/EFA
3 Years Experience
In-depth Interviews • Cognitive Task Analysis • Contextual Inquiry • Usability Testing • Personality Assessment • Competitive Analysis
2 Years Experience
Proficient in Figma for creating intuitive user interfaces and interactions. Skilled in wire-framing and prototyping to bring ideas to life and validate design decisions through iterative testing.
Former UX Researcher Intern at KuaiShou Technology
Gained hands-on experience conducting user research across diverse product ecosystems, from short-form video platforms to cutting-edge AI applications.
Carnegie Mellon University
Advanced training in designing and evaluating interactive systems, combining technical proficiency with user-centered design principles.
Deep foundation in psychological research methods, cognitive processes, and human behavior—essential for understanding user needs and motivations.
Explore some of my impactful research projects that demonstrate a blend of psychological insights and technological innovation, driving meaningful user experiences.

A research-driven project of AI tutor (DOT) that increased engagement by scaffolding learning through in-context AI Activation Point instead of passive chat usage.
Product Lead · 8 months
Key Areas: # Human-AI Interaction # Ed-Tech

Rapid 3-month concept-to-launch iteration by translating physician insights directly into features of a physician dashboard
Product Manager Intern · 3 months
Key Areas: # Healthcare

Dual-sided UX research on a creator marketplace to map real workflows, identify collaboration breakdowns between buyers and sellers
UX Researcher at Kuaishou · 4 months
Key Areas: # E-commerce
Project 1
Improving Student Engagement with AI Tutor
This project involved a research-driven initiative for an AI tutor (DOT) aimed at increasing user engagement. The core idea was to scaffold learning through proactive, in-context AI Activation Points rather than relying solely on passive chat usage.
Organization: CMU Open Learning Initiative (OLI), funded by Gates Foundation
Role: Product Lead · 8 months
Key Areas: # Human-AI Interaction # Ed-Tech
The Challenge
remained extremely low.
Only 11% of 4,249 students used DOT*, with most interactions limited to 1–5 times across entire semester-long Chemistry course. Students frequently opted for other resources such as YouTube, or peer assistance.
The goal of the research is to find out:

DOT: Digital Online Tutor, AI assistant that is omnipresent in the REAL CHEM, trained on the REAL CHEM courseware, including the actual chemistry content and the specifics of each section (e.g., due dates)

Method
Our goal was to understand why students ignored the AI tutor (DOT) and to design interventions for learning-centered AI engagement.
Methods:
Students are not inherently against AI. Instead, they seek structured, step-by-step assistance and timely visibility of help, moving beyond simple chat interactions.
We presented findings and design opportunities to the OLI team. Based on this research, the product direction shifted toward proactive guidance — leading to activation point features for DOT.
Research Method
We presented findings and design opportunities to the OLI team. Based on this research, the product direction shifted toward proactive guidance — leading to activation point features for DOT.
Intervention Tested: AI Activation Points + Updated base prompt.
Methods:
Students shifted from passive answer-checking to guided problem solving, increasing engagement from 11% to 46% (4x).
Solution
With AI Activation Points, DOT no longer relies on students to seek help but proactively engages them in their learning journey.
To increase awareness, deepen learning, and reduce copy-paste misuse, we introduced three proactive AI Activation types that guide students at key learning moments.

DOT pops up automatically when students open a page, posing metacognitive questions about learning strategies and introducing social psychology interventions (e.g., growth mindset)

Prompts create dialog about what students have just read, asking clarifying questions, addressing potential misconceptions, or reinforcing understanding of key concepts.

Provides immediate feedback on the correctness of written responses to constructed response questions, such as those found in REAL CHEM simulations.
Other solution: Base Prompt Updated: Reluctant to directly answer homework questions/ Must be concise + structured + correct LaTeX
Impact & Learning
The implementation of AI Activation Points significantly transformed student engagement and secured institutional commitment for continued innovation.
Student usage of DOT surged from 11% to 46% after the introduction of activation points.
A significant portion of students (36%) now proactively seek help, moving beyond passive interactions.
The AI feature was adopted by 25+ instructors and deployed to over 15,000 learners. Also implemented in multiple independent-learner courses.
The project helped OLI secure continued Gates Foundation support for AI learning innovation; Strengthened OLI’s position for future grant opportunities related to AI and learning innovation
When Designing AI Features
1. Seamless workflow integration drives engagement AI must appear at natural moments in the learner journey.
2. Users value agency and control: There is a careful balance between automation and user autonomy. Users prefer AI that offers support without taking over the task or making decisions for them.
Scan the QR code to log in.
Go to Unit 1 "How to Use AI in REALCHEM" experience DOT's AI-powered onboarding in REAL CHEM for yourself!


Project 2 
Transforming fragmented health data into a continuous, personalized story of well-being
Led end-to-end research to design an AI-supported physician dashboard that transforms scattered health data into actionable, longitudinal insights supporting preventive care decisions
Organization: CMU Corporate Startup Lab
Client: Forefront Concierge Medicine
Role: Product Manager Intern
Key Areas: # AI # Healthcare
The Challenge
"Physicians are drowning in tasks they were never trained for, and patients are left guessing about what they’re supposed to do."
— Gabe, CEO of Forefront Concierge Medicine
"U.S. primary care ranks last among high-income countries."
— The Commonwealth Fund
Client Requirements
Build monitoring platform (YHYP) aggregating labs, EHR data, wearables, lifestyle metrics, a new operating system for proactive care
Research Question
How might we design a second set of eyes for physicians?
We framed the project in three phases, with research embedded as the driver of design:

We built a new operating system for proactive care that help physicians reclaim prep time, accelerate documentation, and surface hidden risks for earlier intervention.
Enabled launch-ready platform now actively used by concierge physicians
Delivered significant reduction in pre-visit preparation time
“From a cardiovascular standpoint, these AI recommendations are appropriate. Doctors often miss things like ACE inhibitors or the DASH diet — having AI surface those and letting me click once to add them to the action plan would be a real one-stop shop.”
- Dr. Amir

“I love having vitals, labs, and wearable data all in one place. I'd pull this up with patients and walk through it visually during visits — incredibly helpful for clinical decision-making.”
- Dr. Sheena


Project 3
UX Research Intern
Dual-Perspective Research Framework
Rather than asking “Who is satisfied and who isn’t?”, I reframed the core problem as:
Where is the platform failing to effectively connect supply and demand?
Does the platform truly support efficient creative transactions?
Where do buyer and seller expectations diverge?
Which breakdowns directly impact conversion and retention?
I used a dual-sided survey design, so both buyers and sellers were asked similar questions:
70 participants
Roles: purchasing managers, ad reviewers, campaign operators
37% had used the platform for more than 1 year
88 participants
Mostly business owners or studio leads
Most had 1–5 years of professional production experience
Both sides rated the platform at a moderate satisfaction level:
out of 5
out of 5
This suggested the platform was "okay" — but not strong enough to be the working tool for collaboration
All issues clustered into four core experience gaps
This research helped align product, design, and e-commerce teams around improving marketplace efficiency.

I'd love to chat!
leehsinfen52@gmail.com
+1 (412) 973-8285
Hey!